Blog

Expatriate Assignment: Return on Investment

February 10, 2011 by MSI

At the Worldwide ERC® 2010 Global Workforce Summit this past October, the focus of many sessions was the return on investment (ROI) of expatriate assignments and the talent management systems that address this issue.

Only 14% of global mobility managers report they have any type of initiative to determine the ROI. The top reason the others give for not having an initiative in place? There has been little internal pressure to do so. However, with the costs of an average expatriate assignment often at a high-priced level (one-and-a-half to four times the cost of a local employee); the justification of sending employees abroad is now under intense scrutiny by global organizations. So, what specifically can an organization do to measure the ROI of the expatriate assignment?

The place to start is to determine what the costs are and what they consider to be a successful assignment and then track that information. According to data issued from Mercer, only 31% of companies keep information on international assignment costs in a centralized database and that only five percent have any kind of process for tracking the ROI of global assignments.

Tracking aside, the real challenge tends to be for the organization to define what it considers to be a successful assignment, because it does not fit a universal standard and also faces inconsistent treatment across the organization; however, standardization does become easier in organizations with shared service centers that handle assignment administration.

Successful HR leaders and global mobility managers are looking to make strides by enhancing the quality of their discussions regarding assignments and linkage to business effectiveness. Some of the practice principles organizations may want to consider include:

  1. Be explicit about the individual’s objectives for the expatriate assignment and ensure that those tie-in with the organization’s overarching business strategy.
  2. Ensure that assignee selection addresses the assignee, home and host sponsors of the organization, and the business goal(s).
  3. Be explicit about the assignment purpose and the assignment-specific objectives to be achieved.
  4. As the purpose of the assignment changes, be sure to recalibrate both the purpose and the corresponding business objectives.
  5. Manage the performance appraisal process during the assignment by keeping a focus on the achievement of the assignment objectives and address longer-term career development.
  6. If the assignment objectives have been achieved, make an evaluation of whether or not the assignment should be terminated.
  7. Take steps to prevent repatriate disaffection and have the next role in the expatriate’s career development outlined.
  8. Periodically review the performance of the global mobility policy and benchmark results.

Share with us your current challenges and successes…

Posted in Global Mobility Management | Link to this post |  | Comments (1)
Tags: , ,

Comments (1) -

Trisha Carter
2/11/2011 4:02:35 AM #

Excellent article.  
So 14% have some type of initiative to determine ROI while 31% keep centralized cost information.  What percentage of companies take the first step in the principles described above of making the purpose of the assignment explicit and agreed on by both the home and host?  And then aligning those with the individuals objectives so real measurement can take place?  

Reply

Add comment




  Country flag
biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading